From 2171672c2e5dab9b4e512a8120f917f2a5fdb473 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ian Jauslin <ian.jauslin@roma1.infn.it>
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2016 22:22:07 +0000
Subject: As presented at Copenhagen University on 2016-01-13

---
 Jauslin_Copenhagen_2016.tex | 247 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 247 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 Jauslin_Copenhagen_2016.tex

(limited to 'Jauslin_Copenhagen_2016.tex')

diff --git a/Jauslin_Copenhagen_2016.tex b/Jauslin_Copenhagen_2016.tex
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..d44e609
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Jauslin_Copenhagen_2016.tex
@@ -0,0 +1,247 @@
+\documentclass{kiss}
+\usepackage{presentation}
+\usepackage{header}
+
+\begin{document}
+\pagestyle{empty}
+\hbox{}\vfil
+\bf
+\large
+\hfil A Pfaffian formula\par
+\smallskip
+\hfil for monomer-dimer partition functions\par
+\vfil
+\hfil Ian Jauslin
+\rm
+\normalsize
+
+\vfil
+\small
+\hfil joint with {\normalsize\bf A.~Giuliani} and {\normalsize\bf E.H.~Lieb}\par
+\vskip10pt
+arXiv: {\tt1510.05027}\hfill{\tt http://ian.jauslin.org/}
+\eject
+
+\pagestyle{plain}
+\setcounter{page}{1}
+
+\title{Monomer-dimer system}
+\bigskip
+\hfil\includegraphics{Figs/even_example.pdf}
+\begin{itemize}
+\item Monomer: occupies a single vertex.
+\item Dimer: occupies an edge and its end-vertices.
+\item Monomer-Dimer (MD) covering: every vertex is occupied exactly once.
+\end{itemize}
+\eject
+
+\addtocounter{page}{-1}
+\title{Monomer-dimer system}
+\bigskip
+\hfil\includegraphics{Figs/MD_example.pdf}
+\begin{itemize}
+\item Monomer: occupies a single vertex.
+\item Dimer: occupies an edge and its end-vertices.
+\item Monomer-Dimer (MD) covering: every vertex is occupied exactly once.
+\end{itemize}
+\eject
+
+\title{Partition function}
+\begin{itemize}
+\item Weights: edges $d_e$, vertices $\ell_v$ (for simplicity, assume they are $\ge0$).
+\item Partition function:
+$$
+\Xi(\bm\ell,\mathbf d)=\sum_{\mathrm{MD\ coverings}}\prod_{\mAthop{e:}_{\mAthop{\mathrm{occupied}}_{\mathrm{by\ dimer}}}}d_e\prod_{\mAthop{v:}_{\mAthop{\mathrm{occupied}}_{\mathrm{\ by\ monomer}}}}\ell_v.
+$$
+\end{itemize}
+\eject
+
+\title{Kasteleyn's theorem}
+\begin{itemize}
+\item If there are {\bf no monomers} (i.e. $\ell_v=0$ for all $v$), then $\Xi$ counts pairs of neighboring vertices:
+$$
+\Xi(\mathbf0,\mathbf d)=\frac1{n!2^n}\sum_{\pi\in\mathcal S_{2n}}\prod_{i=1}^nd_{(\pi(2i-1),\pi(2i))}.
+$$
+\end{itemize}
+\hfil\includegraphics[width=3cm]{Figs/even_example_label_nodir.pdf}
+\eject
+
+\title{Kasteleyn's theorem}
+\begin{itemize}
+\item If there are {\bf no monomers} (i.e. $\ell_v=0$ for all $v$), then $\Xi$ counts pairs of neighboring vertices:
+$$
+\Xi(\mathbf0,\mathbf d)=\frac1{n!2^n}\sum_{\pi\in\mathcal S_{2n}}\prod_{i=1}^nd_{(\pi(2i-1),\pi(2i))}.
+$$
+\end{itemize}
+\hfil\includegraphics[width=3cm]{Figs/even_example_label_nodir_dimers.pdf}
+\eject
+
+\title{Kasteleyn's theorem}
+\begin{itemize}
+\item Assume, in addition, that the graph is {\bf planar}.
+\item [Kasteleyn, 1963]: {\color{blue}Direct} the graph in such a way that, for every face, moving along the boundary of the face in the counterclockwise direction, the number of arrows going against the motion is odd.
+\end{itemize}
+\hfil\includegraphics{Figs/even_example_directed.pdf}
+\eject
+
+\title{Kasteleyn's theorem}
+\begin{itemize}
+\item Recall
+$$
+\Xi(\mathbf0,\mathbf d)=\frac1{n!2^n}\sum_{\pi\in\mathcal S_{2n}}\prod_{i=1}^nd_{(\pi(2i-1),\pi(2i))}.
+$$
+\item Kasteleyn's theorem: if $s_{i,j}:=+1$ if $i\rightarrow j$ and $-1$ if $j\rightarrow i$, then
+$$
+\Xi(\mathbf0,\mathbf d)=\left|\frac1{n!2^n}\sum_{\pi\in\mathcal S_{2n}}(-1)^\pi\prod_{i=1}^nd_{(\pi(2i-1),\pi(2i))}s_{\pi(2i-1),\pi(2i)}\right|.
+$$
+\item In other words, $(-1)^\pi\prod_{i=1}^ns_{\pi(2i-1),\pi(2i)}$ is {\color{blue} independent} of $\pi$.
+\end{itemize}
+\eject
+
+\title{Kasteleyn's theorem}
+\begin{itemize}
+\item $(-1)^\pi\prod_{i=1}^ns_{\pi(2i-1),\pi(2i)}$:
+\end{itemize}
+\hfil\includegraphics{Figs/even_example_label_dimers.pdf}
+\eject
+
+\title{Kasteleyn's theorem}
+\begin{itemize}
+\item Recall
+$$
+\Xi(\mathbf0,\mathbf d)=\left|\frac1{n!2^n}\sum_{\pi\in\mathcal S_{2n}}(-1)^\pi\prod_{i=1}^nd_{(\pi(2i-1),\pi(2i))}s_{\pi(2i-1),\pi(2i)}\right|.
+$$
+\item Introducing an antisymmetric matrix $a$ with entries $a_{i,j}:=d_{(i,j)}s_{i,j}$ for $i<j$,
+$$
+\Xi(\mathbf0,\mathbf d)=|\mathrm{pf}(a)|
+$$
+with
+$$
+\mathrm{pf}(a)=\frac1{n!2^n}\sum_{\pi\in\mathcal S_{2n}}(-1)^\pi\prod_{i=1}^na_{\pi(2i-1),\pi(2i)}.
+$$
+\item Determinantal relation: $\mathrm{pf(a)}^2=\det(a)$.
+\end{itemize}
+\eject
+
+\title{Boundary monomers}
+\begin{itemize}
+\item Assume the monomers are on the {\bf boundary} of the graph.
+\item If the monomers are fixed, the MD partition function reduces to a pure dimer partition function on a sub-graph.
+\end{itemize}
+\hfil\includegraphics{Figs/even_example_monomer_shadow.pdf}
+\eject
+
+\title{Boundary monomers}
+\begin{itemize}
+\item By Kasteleyn's theorem
+$$
+\Xi(\bm\ell,\mathbf d)=\sum_{\mathcal M:\ \mathrm{monomers}}\left|\mathrm{pf}([a]_{\mathcal M})\right|\prod_{v\in\mathcal M}\ell_v
+$$
+where $[a]_{\mathcal M}$ is obtained from $a$ by removing the lines and columns corresponding to vertices in $\mathcal M$.
+\item[Lieb, 1968]: if $A_{i,j}=a_{i,j}+(-1)^{i+j}\ell_i\ell_j$ for $i<j$ and $A_{j,i}=-A_{i,j}$, then
+$$\mathrm{pf}(A)=\sum_{\mathcal M}\mathrm{pf}([a]_{\mathcal M})\prod_{v\in\mathcal M}\ell_v.$$
+\end{itemize}
+\eject
+
+\title{Boundary monomers}
+\begin{itemize}
+\item Question: is the sign of $\mathrm{pf}([a]_{\mathcal M})$ independent of $\mathcal M$?
+\item In general, no:
+\end{itemize}
+\hfil\includegraphics{Figs/even_example_counterexample_label.pdf}
+\eject
+
+\addtocounter{page}{-1}
+\title{Boundary monomers}
+\begin{itemize}
+\item Question: is the sign of $\mathrm{pf}([a]_{\mathcal M})$ independent of $\mathcal M$?
+\item In general, no:
+\end{itemize}
+\hfil\includegraphics{Figs/even_example_counterexample_label_dimers.pdf}
+\eject
+
+\addtocounter{page}{-1}
+\title{Boundary monomers}
+\begin{itemize}
+\item Question: is the sign of $\mathrm{pf}([a]_{\mathcal M})$ independent of $\mathcal M$?
+\item In general, no:
+\end{itemize}
+\hfil\includegraphics{Figs/even_example_counterexample_monomer.pdf}
+\eject
+
+\addtocounter{page}{-1}
+\title{Boundary monomers}
+\begin{itemize}
+\item Question: is the sign of $\mathrm{pf}([a]_{\mathcal M})$ independent of $\mathcal M$?
+\item In general, no:
+\end{itemize}
+\hfil\includegraphics{Figs/even_example_counterexample_monomer_dimers.pdf}
+\eject
+
+\title{Boundary monomers}
+\begin{itemize}
+\item The vertices must be labeled and the edges directed correctly.
+\end{itemize}
+\hfil\includegraphics{Figs/even_example_phantom.pdf}
+\eject
+
+\addtocounter{page}{-1}
+\title{Boundary monomers}
+\begin{itemize}
+\item The vertices must be labeled and the edges directed correctly.
+\end{itemize}
+\hfil\includegraphics{Figs/even_example_label_pre.pdf}
+\eject
+
+\addtocounter{page}{-1}
+\title{Boundary monomers}
+\begin{itemize}
+\item The vertices must be labeled and the edges directed correctly.
+\end{itemize}
+\hfil\includegraphics{Figs/even_example_label.pdf}
+\eject
+
+\title{Main theorem}
+\vfill
+\begin{framed}
+Every {\bf planar} graph can be labeled and directed in such a way that the {\bf boundary} monomer-dimer partition function is
+$$
+\Xi(\bm\ell,\mathbf d)=\mathrm{pf}(A)
+$$
+with $A_{i,j}=d_{(i,j)}s_{i,j}+(-1)^{i+j}\ell_i\ell_j$ for $i<j$.
+\end{framed}
+\vfill
+\eject
+
+\title{Sketch of the proof}
+\hfil\includegraphics[width=6cm]{Figs/enclosed_example_phantom.pdf}
+\eject
+
+\addtocounter{page}{-1}
+\title{Sketch of the proof}
+\hfil\includegraphics[width=6cm]{Figs/enclosed_example_auxiliary_thin.pdf}
+\eject
+
+\addtocounter{page}{-1}
+\title{Sketch of the proof}
+\hfil\includegraphics[width=6cm]{Figs/enclosed_example_cover_phantom.pdf}
+\eject
+
+\addtocounter{page}{-1}
+\title{Sketch of the proof}
+\hfil\includegraphics[width=6cm]{Figs/enclosed_example_auxiliary_cover.pdf}
+\eject
+
+\title{Boundary monomer correlations}
+\begin{itemize}
+\item Monomer correlations at close packing:
+$$
+M_n(i_1,\cdots,i_{2n})=\frac1{\Xi(\mathbf0,\mathbf d)}\left.\frac{\partial^{2n}\Xi(\bm\ell,\mathbf d)}{\partial\ell_1\cdots\partial\ell_{2n}}\right|_{\bm\ell=\mathbf0}.
+$$
+\item Fermionic Wick rule:
+$$
+M_n(i_1,\cdots,i_{2n})=\frac1{n!2^n}\sum_{\pi\in\mathcal S_{2n}}(-1)^\pi\prod_{j=1}^nM_1(i_{\pi(2j-1)},i_{\pi(2j)}).
+$$
+\end{itemize}
+
+\end{document}
-- 
cgit v1.2.3-70-g09d2